a number of times now LBird has claimed they don't need to reply to my argument because i haven't read the same books as them.
is that legit ?
lem_ wrote: a number of times now LBird has claimed they don't need to reply to my argument because i haven't read the same books as them. is that legit ?
Let's face it, lem_, I don't claim that at all.
I don't reply any more, for two reasons:
1. You won't read and discuss anything;
2. You simply abuse me personally.
i obviously do read and discuss things.
lem_ wrote: i obviously do read and discuss things.
Why not do so, then, about 'theories of truth'?
LBird wrote: lem_ wrote: i obviously do read and discuss things. Why not do so, then, about 'theories of truth'?
i'd rather chat aggressively about it :-/
Let's face it, lem_, I don't claim that at all.
I don't reply any more, for two reasons:
1. You won't read and discuss anything;
2. You simply abuse me personally.
i obviously do read and discuss things.
Why not do so, then, about 'theories of truth'?
i'd rather chat aggressively about it :-/