hey i don't mean to sound dismissive.
from what i understand they consist of highly organized cells of militants that see themselves as the heir of bordiga's ideas... so antidemocratic etc.. and very dismissive of everyone else, which seems hopeful.
what do they see their role as? i kinda get the vague and idle notion that what made bordiga interesting was the couter revolution, and without it the "bordigists" don't serve much purpose. this is just me trying to start a discussion tho ha.