International Communist Current

Since the report on the class struggle to the last Congress, there have been no immediate shifts in the overall situation facing the class. The proletariat has demonstrated, through various struggles, that its combativity remains intact and that its discontent is growing (eg transport workers in New York, 'general strike' in Norway, struggles in numerous sectors in France, postal workers in Britain, movements in peripheral countries like Brazil, China, etc). But the situation continues to be much more clearly defined by the difficulties facing the class - difficulties imposed by the conditions of decomposing capitalism but continually reinforced by the bourgeoisie's ideological campaigns about the 'end of the working class', the 'new economy', 'globalisation', and even 'anti-capitalism'. Within the proletarian political milieu, meanwhile, there remain fundamental disagreements about the balance of class forces, with certain groups using the ICC's 'idealist' view of the historic course as a reason for not participating in any joint initiative against the war in Kosovo. This is certainly one reason to focus this report not so much on the struggles of the recent period, but on trying to deepen our understanding of the concept of the historic course as it has developed in the workers' movement: if we are to answer these criticisms effectively, we must obviously go to the historical root of the misunderstandings that infect the proletarian milieu. Another reason is that one of the weaknesses in our own analyses of recent struggles has been a tendency towards immediatism, a tendency to concentrate on particular struggles as 'proof' of our position on the course, or on the difficulties of the struggle as a possible basis for calling our conceptions into question. What follows is very far from an exhaustive survey; it's main aim is to assist the organisation to acquaint itself more closely with the general method through which marxism has approached this question.

In n°5 of Revolutionary Perspectives, the organ of the Communist Workers’ Organisation (CWO), we find an article entitled “Sects, Lies, and the Lost Perspective of the ICC”, which is intended as a response to our article “A Rudderless Policy of Regroupment”, published in the International Review n°87 (this text itself being a reply to a letter from the CWO published in the same issue of the Review). The CWO’s article deals with many questions, notably the method by which communist organisations should be built, to which we will return in a later issue of this Review. In this article we will largely limit ourselves to one aspect of the CWO’s polemic: the idea that the ICC is in crisis because of its mistakes in analysing the historic course.

Since 1968, the revolutionary groups which have come to form the ICC have been arguing that the international wave of workers’ struggles which began in France that year marked a new period in the balance of forces between bourgeoisie and proletariat: the ending of the long period of counter-revolution which followed the reflux of the 1917-23 revolution wave; the opening up of a course towards generalised was class confrontations. While the accelerating collapse of the capitalist economy could not fail to push the bourgeoisie towards another world war, this same economic disintegration was provoking a vigorous resistance by a new and undefeated generation of workers.

Between 1845 and 1847, the world, and Europe in particular, following on from a series of
bad harvests, went through a grave economic crisis. In France the price of grain doubled, giving rise to
hunger riots. The ruined peasants could no longer buy industrial products:
unemployment  became general, wages fell,
the number of bankruptcies soared. The working class embarked on a struggle for
reforms: for the limitation of the working day, for a minimum wage, for jobs,
for the right to form associations and to strike, for civil equality and the
suppression of privileges, etc.

how is it that the ICC can talk about the intensification of inter-imperialist antagonisms today, while at the same time asserting that, since the end of the 1960s, bourgeois society has been in a period of rising class struggle? Isn’t there a contradiction between warning against the danger of war in Africa and the Middle East, and the analysis which holds that the economic crisis has opened up a new course towards proletarian struggle, towards a decisive confrontation between the classes? Are we living through re-run of the 1930s, with generalized war looming on the horizon, or is there a revolutionary perspective in front of us?